Why Do We Care About Joint vs. Several Guaranties?

文章推薦指數: 80 %
投票人數:10人

With a “several” guaranty, each guarantor is agreeing to be liable to the lender for up to $500,000 irrespective of what the other guarantor has repaid. In our ... WhyDoWeCareAboutJointvs.SeveralGuaranties? Inthisverycompetitivelendingenvironment,itisnotuncommonfortheprincipalsofamiddlemarketborrowertoattempttopushbackagainstalender’scustomaryrequestforunlimitedgeneralguarantiesoftheborrower’sobligations. Ifthelenderagreestoacceptlimited(ratherthangeneral)guarantiesfromtheborrower’sprincipals,particularcareneedstobetakeninnegotiatingthescopeofsuchlimitedguarantiesespeciallywhendraftingandnegotiatingthetermsheetorcommitmentletter.  Withrespecttounlimited(orgeneral)guaranties,allguarantorsagreetoeachberesponsibleforthefullamountofthedebtordebtsbeingguarantied. Forlimitedguaranties,thescopeofsuchguarantiesistrickierandmaybelimitedinanynumberofways,forexampletoaspecificdollaramount,ortoaspecifiedpercentageoftheoutstandingloanbalancewhichisoftentiedtoaprincipal’sownershippercentageinthebusiness. Anunlimitedguarantyistypicallyframedasa“jointandseveral”obligationofeachguarantor. Bythiswemeanthateachguarantorisfullyresponsibleforrepaymentoftheentireobligationguarantiedandthelendermaycollectthefullamountofsuchobligationfromoneguarantororfromanycombinationofguarantors;providedthatthelendermayonlycollectthefullloanamountonce. Ifoneguarantorrepaystheentireobligation,theotherguarantorsareoffthehook. Withalimitedguaranty,theextentoftheobligationbeingundertakenmaynotbeasclear. Assumeaborrowerisborrowing$1,000,000andthatitstwoprincipalshaveagreedtoexecuteguarantiesoftheloanlimitedto$500,000. Itisimportantthatboththelenderandtheborrower/guarantorpartiesallhavethesameunderstandingastotheextentoftheobligationbeingundertakenbytheprincipal/guarantors. Ifthelimitedguarantiesprovidefor“jointandseveral”liabilityof$500,000,thismeansthatonlythetotalamountof$500,000isguarantiedbythetwoguarantorsregardlessofwhichonerepaysitorinwhatproportions. Oncetheguarantorshavetogetherrepaidthelendertheamountof$500,000,bothguarantiesareextinguishedandthelenderhasnofurtherrecoursetoeitheroftheguarantors. Alender,however,willoftenintendto“stack”thelimitedguarantiessuchthatthefullamountoftheguarantiedobligations,inourexample$1,000,000,isrecoverablefromtheguarantors,i.e.,$500,000fromeach. Ifthelenderintendstostacktheguarantiesinthismanner,thetermsoftheguarantymustindicatethattheguarantyisa“several”andnota“jointandseveral”obligationoftheguarantors. Witha“several”guaranty,eachguarantorisagreeingtobeliabletothelenderforupto$500,000irrespectiveofwhattheotherguarantorhasrepaid. Inourexample,“several”guarantiesfromtheguarantorswouldprovideforfullcoverageofthe$1,000,000loan. Innegotiatingloanterms,itisnotunusualforthelenderandborrowertoglossoversuch“technicalities”butclarityonwhatisintendediscriticaltoavoidconfusioninthelender’sinternalloanapprovalprocess,inthetermsheetcirculatedtotheborrowerandinthefinalloandocuments. Lastminutedisputessuchas“weneveragreedtoeachbeliablefor$500,000,butrathertobejointlyliableforonly$500,000”especiallywheretheloanapprovalassumed“several”liabilityof$500,000each,canbedifficulttoresolveandcaneitherdelayorderailaloanclosing. Further,particularcareshouldbetakenwhenmodifyingalender’sstandardformofgeneralorunlimitedguarantyforuseasalimitedguarantytobecertainthatthecustomary“jointandseveral”languageofageneralguarantyismodifiedtoachievea“stacking”guaranty. Thisisanissuewhichweoftenseewhenwereviewloandocumentsinconnectionwithundertakingcollectionactivitiesforlendersanditmaymateriallyimpactsuccessfulcollectionoftheobligation. Besideslimitingtheamountoftheguarantyobligationundertakenbyaguarantor,aborroweranditsprincipalsmayalsorequestthattheguarantyobligationonlyripenafterthelenderhasundertakenand/orcompletedcollectioneffortsagainsttheborrower,i.e.,thattheguarantyisaguarantyofcollectionandnotapaymentguaranty. Thistypeofguarantyisoftenreferredtoasa“deficiency”or“marshaling”guaranty. Westronglydiscouragealenderfromagreeingtothistypeofguarantywherethelenderagreesto“lookfirst”totheborrowerortothecollateralbeforeseekingrepaymentfromaguarantor. Thelimitationsofadeficiencyormarshalingguarantycanmateriallydelayorimpairthelender’sabilitytolegallypursueaguarantoruntilALLcollectionactivitiesagainsttheborrowerorcollateralhavebeencompleted. Werecommendthatbothunlimited/generalguarantiesandlimitedguarantiesbedraftedasprimaryandunconditionalsourcesofrepaymentandthattheynotbecontingentonthelendereitherpursuingtheborrowerorcollateralfirstoruponalender’srecoveryofitsdebtfromothersources. Aswithallloanterms,theearlierthespecificsareclearlystatedandunderstoodbythelenderandtheborrowerparties(usuallyinatermsheetorcommitmentletter),thelessthelikelihoodofdisputesandconfusionastheloanclosingapproachesorwhenenforcementoftheloandocumentsispursued. Itisneverhelpfulforalender-borrowerrelationshiptostartoffonthewrongfootbecauseofalackofclarityastotheloantermsandthescopeofaprincipal’sliabilityforrepayment. RichardE.GentilliistheseniorcommerciallitigatorwithHackettFeinbergandhassuccessfullydefendedmanylenderliabilityclaimsovertheyears.   BrianF.Plunkettisaco-managingpartnerofthefirmandhasover3decadesofexperienceincommercialandrealestatefinancetransactions,troubledloanworkoutsandsecuredpartyremedies. HackettFeinberg,P.C.isa27lawyerBostonfirmspecializinginBankingandCommercialFinance,BankruptcyandCreditorsRights,BusinessandCorporateLaw,CommercialRealEstate,EmploymentLitigationandCounseling,LifetimeTrustandEstatePlanning,LitigationandDisputeResolution. Thiscommunicationisforinformationalpurposesonlyandshouldnotbeconstruedaslegaladviceonanyspecificfactsorcircumstances. RecentPosts WhyDoWeCareAboutSecuredPartySales? WhyDoWeCareAboutKeyProvisionsinGuaranties? WhyDoWeCareAboutConsiderationforGuaranties? WhyDoWeCareAboutDragnetClauses? HackettFeinbergannouncesJosephE.BrookshasbeennamedPartner RecentCommentsMrWordPressonThirdAnnualNovemberfest!Archives July2022 May2022 April2022 March2022 January2022 December2021 November2021 October2021 September2021 August2021 July2021 June2021 May2021 April2021 March2021 February2021 January2021 December2020 November2020 October2020 September2020 August2020 July2020 June2020 May2020 April2020 March2020 January2020 September2019 August2019 July2019 June2019 May2019 April2019 February2019 January2019 December2018 October2018 September2018 August2018 June2018 May2018 March2018 February2018 January2018 October2017 August2017 June2017 May2017 April2017 March2017 February2017 January2017 December2016 November2016 September2016 August2016 Categories News OurPeople PracticeAreas Uncategorized Meta Login Entriesfeed Commentsfeed WordPress.org HackettFeinbergP.C.,155FederalStreet,9thFloor,Boston,MA02110Telephone:617-422-0200,Facsimile:617-422-0383 Email:[email protected]



請為這篇文章評分?