甘藍黑腳病菌之生理特性及其病害防治

文章推薦指數: 80 %
投票人數:10人

本菌在馬鈴薯葡萄糖瓊脂培養基(PDA)上生長緩慢,菌絲初期為白色,隨後逐漸呈橄欖綠或深綠色,隨後產生分生孢子器(pycnidia)及器孢子(pycnidiospore)。

資料載入處理中... 跳到主要內容 臺灣博碩士論文加值系統 ::: 網站導覽| 首頁| 關於本站| 聯絡我們| 國圖首頁| 常見問題| 操作說明 English |FB專頁 |Mobile 免費會員 登入| 註冊 功能切換導覽列 (178.128.221.219)您好!臺灣時間:2022/04/1312:08 字體大小:       ::: 詳目顯示 recordfocus 第1筆/ 共1筆  /1頁 論文基本資料 摘要 外文摘要 目次 參考文獻 紙本論文 論文連結 QRCode 本論文永久網址: 複製永久網址Twitter研究生:曾淑菁研究生(外文):Shu-ChingTseng論文名稱:甘藍黑腳病菌之生理特性及其病害防治論文名稱(外文):StudiesonthephysiologicalcharacteristicsofLeptosphaeriamaculansanditsdiseasecontrol指導教授:郭章信指導教授(外文):Chang-HsinKuo學位類別:碩士校院名稱:國立嘉義大學系所名稱:生物資源學系研究所學門:生命科學學門學類:生物科技學類論文種類:學術論文畢業學年度:100語文別:中文論文頁數:72中文關鍵詞:甘藍菜、小球腔菌、黑腳病外文關鍵詞:BrassicaoleraceaL.、Leptosphaeriamaculans、Blacklegdisease、Phomalingam相關次數: 被引用:0點閱:892評分:下載:0書目收藏:0 甘藍黑腳病(blacklegdisease)分布在溫帶地區,而本省僅發現於高冷蔬菜地區,近年來,本病害嚴重影響甘藍菜之產量,平地則尚未有發生之記錄。

由罹病株經組織分離所得之菌株,經外部形態及ITSrDNA鑑定為Leptosphaeriamaculans,本菌製作孢子懸浮液以種子浸漬法接種確定病原性。

經接種之甘藍種子在幼苗期均可表現病徵,在葉片上產生明顯的灰色病斑,病斑逐漸擴大,終至幼苗倒伏枯死。

本菌在馬鈴薯葡萄糖瓊脂培養基(PDA)上生長緩慢,菌絲初期為白色,隨後逐漸呈橄欖綠或深綠色,隨後產生分生孢子器(pycnidia)及器孢子(pycnidiospore)。

以不同接種種源密度接種甘藍種子之結果顯示,孢子濃度在105-106spores/ml時,具有較高致病力,發病率可達80%以上,濃度在103以下不發病。

測試溫度對病原菌之影響,溫度對菌絲生長以20℃為最佳,5℃-35℃均可生長,40℃以上不生長;在產孢方面,分生孢子器數產生以20℃最佳,10℃-30℃均可形成分生孢子器;孢子發芽最適溫度以25℃為最佳,10℃-30℃孢子均可發芽。

測試不同相對濕度對孢子發芽之影響試驗結果顯示,孢子發芽率隨相對濕度增加而遞減,相對濕度85%時發芽率達82.8%。

以不同培養基培養病原菌結果顯示,病原菌在10%V-8瓊脂、20%V-8瓊脂及PDA上菌絲生長最快;而在產孢上則以PDA為最佳。

測試不同碳及氮素源對病原菌菌絲生長及產孢之影響,供試十一種碳素源中以半乳糖、果糖促進菌絲生長的效果最佳;在供試十三種氮素源中,以蛋白腖、精氨酸促進菌絲生長效果最佳。

測定不同酸鹼值對菌絲生長之影響,結果顯示培養基酸鹼值在4-5之間為最佳。

初步篩選四十三種中草藥粗萃液防治本病害,取50μl粗萃液分別與等量的孢子懸浮液混合,滴於3孔載玻片上,每處理六重複,測試結果顯示以厚朴、香椿、黃岑、肉桂、丁香、麻黃、八角、黃蓮、五倍子、何首烏、百里香、雞屎藤、開脾草及赤山葡萄之粗萃液可顯著抑制病原菌孢子發芽,與對照組相比,孢子發芽率由88%降至1%。

測試拮抗菌對病原菌之抑制效果,結果顯示篩選所得之拮抗細菌BV-1、PWP-1、PWP-2及拮抗酵母菌163、251、333、G14菌株經對峙培養對Leptosphaeriamaculans皆具有抑制效果。

以篩選化學藥劑防治本病害,結果以腐絕、待克利、普克利、依滅列抑制菌絲生長效果最佳,進一步在溫室中以幼苗接種試驗測試,結果以待克利、普克利、依滅列有防治效果,但會有抑制幼苗頂芽生長之現象。

BlacklegdiseasedistributedintheTemperateZones,wereonlyfoundinthealpineareainTaiwan.Inrecentyears,blacklegdiseaseseverelyaffectproductionofcabbage.Butintheflatgrounddidnothaveanyrecordaboutblacklegdisease.ThecausalagentwasidentifiedasLeptosphaeriamaculansthroughthemorphologyandITSrDNAanalysis.Andmakesporesuspensiontocarryoutthepathogenicitytestbyseedsoaking.Allcabbageseedlingsshowedthesymptomsafterseedsinoculation,andproducedthegrayspotinthecotyledon.Thenthegrayspotgraduallymagnify,finallytheseedlingwaswiltanddead.ThemyceliaofpathogengrownonPDAwaswhiteandgraduallyturnedintogreenorolivegreen,thenproducedpycnidiaandpycnidiospore.Thehighestdiseaseincidenceofblacklegdiseaseofcabbagewereover80%whencabbageseedswereincolatedwith105-106spores/ml,butnoincidencewasfoundin103spores/ml.Thephysiologicalcharacteristicstudiesofthepathogenindicatedthattheoptimumtemperaturewasforthemycelialgrowthat20℃,withtherangesfrom5to35℃.Theoptimumtemperatureforpycnidiasporegerminationwasat25℃.Onsporulation,theoptimumtemperaturewasat20℃,andthematurityofpycnidiawerenotsignificantlywhenculturedat10℃-30℃.Theeffectofdifferentrelativehumidityonsporegerminationtoshowthehumiditytoincreaseandsporesgerminationtolow,Thehighergrowthwasover82.8%inthe85%relativehumidity.Theeffectofculturemediaonthemyceliagrowthandpycnidiamaturityofthepathogenwereconducted.Thedatashowedthatthemycelialgrowthon10%V8,20%V8,PDAandsporulationonPDAhadthehighestgrowthrateamongtestedmedia.Elevencarbonsourcesandthirteennitrogensourceswerechosenasnutrientsforinvestigatingtheireffectsonmyceliagrowthandsporulation.Acomparisonofdifferentcarbonsourcesshowedthatmycelialgrowthratewashighestwhengrownongalactoseandfructose.Acomparisonofdifferentnitrogensourcesshowedthatmyceliagrowthratewashighestwhengrowthonbacto.peptoneandarginine.ThebestofpHvalueformyceliagrowthwasatpH4-5.Preliminaryscreening43kindsofcrudeofchineseherbmedicineoninhibitionofsporegerminationofthepathogenwereconducted.Thedatashowedthat14kindsofcrudeofChinesemedicineherbhadthemostsingnificantinhibitiononsporegerminationwithlowerthan1%comparingtothecontrolwith88%.UsingthepairedculturetoscreeningantagonistsforthecontrolofLeptosphaeriamaculansonPDA,datashowedthatantagonistsofbacteria,BV-1,PWP-1,PWP-2andyeast163,251,333,G14weresignificantlyinhibitedmycelialgrowth.Screeningelevenfungicidesforthecontrolofthepathogen,thedatashowedthatfourfungicides,Thiabendazole,Difenoconazole,PropiconazoleandImazalilhadthemostsingnificantinhibiononmycelialgrowth,however,thedatashowedthatonlyDifenoconazole,PropiconazoleandImazalilwassingnificantefficacyonthecontrolofLeptosphaeriamaculansoncabbageseedlingsbutrestrainedterminalbudsgrowth. 中文摘要....................................................Ι英文摘要....................................................Ⅲ目錄........................................................Ⅴ圖表目次....................................................Ⅷ壹、前言....................................................1貳、材料與方法..............................................7一、甘藍黑腳病菌之分離、培養與病原性測定...................7二、不同孢子濃度接種對病原性之影響........................10三、甘藍黑腳病菌對不同品種甘藍之致病力之測定................11四、甘藍黑腳病菌基本生理測定..............................111.溫度對菌絲生長、產孢量、分生孢子器成熟度及孢子發芽之影響....................................................112.不同培養基對菌絲生長、產孢量及分生孢子器成熟度之影響...123.碳素源對菌絲生長、產孢量及分生孢子器成熟度之影響.......134.氮素源對菌絲生長、產孢量及分生孢子器成熟度之影響.......145.不同酸鹼值對菌絲生長之影響…………………………………….146.相對濕度對孢子發芽率之影響…………………………………….15五、甘藍黑腳病防治試驗……………………………………………..151.篩選中草藥粗萃液對甘藍黑腳病之防治效果………………….152.篩選結抗菌對甘藍黑腳病之防治效果………………………….163.篩選化學藥劑對甘藍黑腳病之防治效果……………………….17參、結果…………………………………………………………………….19一、甘藍黑腳病菌之分離、培養與病原性測定………………………….19二、不同孢子濃度接種對病原性之影響………………………………….19三、甘藍黑腳病菌對不同品種甘藍之致病力之測定……………………20四、甘藍黑腳病菌基本生理測定…………………………………………201.溫度對菌絲生長、產孢量、分生孢子器成熟度及孢子發芽之影響……………………………………………………………………202.不同培養基對菌絲生長、產孢量及分生孢子器成熟度之影響……203.碳素源對菌絲生長、產孢量及分生孢子器成熟度之影響…………214.氮素源對菌絲生長、產孢量及分生孢子器成熟度之影響…………215.不同酸鹼值對菌絲生長之影響…………………………………….216.相對濕度對孢子發芽率之影響…………………………………….21五、甘藍黑腳病防治試驗………………………………………………221.篩選中草藥粗萃液對甘藍黑腳病之防治效果………………….222.篩選結抗菌對甘藍黑腳病之防治效果………………………….223.篩選化學藥劑對甘藍黑腳病之防治效果……………………….22肆、討論…………………………………………………………………….24伍、參考文獻……………………………………………………………….28陸、附錄……………………………………………………………………57 1黃振文。

1989。

十字花科。

台灣農家全書。

行政院農業委員會編。

行政院農業委員會出版。

豐年社發行。

台北。

2費雯綺、王玉美編。

2000。

植物保護手冊。

行政院農業委員會農業藥物毒物試驗所。

3鄭安秀、林益昇。

1995。

台灣農家要覽農作篇。

行政院農業委員會台灣農家要覽增修訂再版策劃委員會。

豐年社出版。

台北。

4Badawy,H.M.A.,andHoppe,H.H.,1989.NonspecificphytotoxiceffectsofsirodesminsonhostandnonhostplantsofLeptosphaeriamaculans.J.Phytopathol.127:137–145.5Balesdent,M.-H.,Gall,C.,Robin,P.,andRouxel,T.,1992.Intra-specificvariationinsolublemycelialproteinandesterasepatternsofLeptosphaeriamaculansFrenchisolates.MycologicalResearch96:677-684.6Boudart,G.,1989.AntibacterialactivityofsirodesminPLphytotoxin:Applicationtotheselectionofphytotoxin-deficientmutants.Appl.Environ.Microbiol.55:1555–1559.7Bokor,A.,Barbetti,M.J.,Brown,A.G.P.,MacNish,G.C.,andWood,P.,1975.Blacklegofrapeseed.JournalofAgricultureofWesternAustralia16:7-177.8Barbetti,M.J.,andKhangura,R.K.,1997.DevelopmentsforbettermanagementofblacklegdiseaseinWesternAustralia.Proceedingsofthe11thAustralianResearchAssemblyonBrassicas,AgricultureWesternAustralia,11-15.9Barbetti,M.J.,andKhangura,R.K.,1999.Managingblackleginthedisease-proneenvironmentofWesternAustralia.Proceedingsofthe10thInternationalRapeseedCongress,Canberra,Australia.10Cunningham,G.H.,1927.Dryrotofswedesandturnips:itscauseandcontrol.NewZealandDepartmentofAgriculture.Wellington,NewZealand:NewZealandDepartmentofAgriculture.Bulletin133.11Curtis,P.J.,Greatbanks,D.,andHesp,B.,1977.SirodesminA,B,CandG.Antiviralepipolythiopiperazine-2,5-dionesoffungalorigin:X-rayanalysisofsirodesminAdiacetate.J.Chem.Soc.PerkinI:180–189.12Eckert,M.R.,Rossall,S.,Selley,A.,andFitt,B.D.L.,2009.EffectsoffungicidesoninvitrosporegerminationandmyceliagrowthofthephytopathogensLeptosphaeriamaculansandL.biglobosa(phomastemcankerofoilseedrape).SocietyofChemicalIndustry.66:396-405.13E.P.,P.H.,1972,CMIDescriptionsofPathogenicFungiandBacteriaNo.331.14Evans,I.R.,Kharbanda,P.D.,andHarrison,L.,1995.BlacklegofcanolasurveyinAlberta1994.CanadianPlantDiseaseSurvey75:136.15Gugel,R.K.,andPetrie,G.A.,1992.History,occurrence,impactandcontrolofblacklegofrapeseed.Can.J.PlantPathology14:36–45.16Hammond,K.E.,andLewis,B.G.,1987.TheestablishmentofsystemicinfectioninleavesofoilseedrapebyLeptosphaeriamaculans.PlantPathology36:135–157.17Harman,G.E.,andNash,G.,1978.Soakingbrassicaseedsinfungicidesolutionstoeradicateseedbornefungi:Acomparisonofaqueousandorganicsolventinfusiontechniques.PlantDiseaseReporter.62:5.18Hammond,K.E.,Lewis,B.G.,andMusa,T.M.,1985.AsystemicpathwayintheinfectionofoilseedrapeplantsbyLeptosphaeriamaculans.PlantPathology34:557–565.19Harrison,L.M.,Kharbanda,P.D.,Stevens,R.R.,andCalpas,J.,1995.SpreadanddistributionofvirulentblacklegofcanolainthePeaceRiverRegionofAlbertain1994.CanadianPlantDiseaseSurvey75:135.20Johnson,R.D.,andLewis,B.G.,1994.Variationinhostrange,systemicinfectionandepidemiologyofLeptosphaeriamaculans.PlantPathology43:269-277.21Kharbanda,P.D.,1992.Performanceoffungicidestocontrolblacklegofcanola.CanadianJournaiofPlantPathology.14:169-176.22Kharbanda,P.D.,Yang,J.,Beatty,P.,Jensen,S.,andTewari,J.P.,1999.BiocontrolofLeptosphaeriamaculansandotherpathogensofcanolawithPaenibacilluspolymyxaPKB1.Proceedingsofthe10thInternationalRapeseedCongress,Canberra.23Kowaslska,J.,andRemlein-Starosta,D.,2011.ResearchofnonchemicalmethodsofwinteroilseedrapeprotectioninPoland.JournalofResearhandApplicationsinAgriculturalEngineering.56(3):220-223.24Marcroft,S.J.,Sprague,S.J.,Salisbury,P.A.,andHowlett,B.J.,2004.PotentialforusingresistancetoreduceproductionofpsedotheciaandascosporesofLeptosphaeriamaculans,theblacklegpathogenofBrassicanapus.PlantPathology.53:468-474.25Pedras,M.S.C.,Seguin-Swartz,G.,andAbrams,S.R.,1990.MinorphytotoxinsfromtheblacklegfungusPhomalingam.Phytochemistry29:777–782.26Pedras,M.S.C.,Taylor,J.L.,andNakashima,T.T.,1993.Anovechemicalsignalfromtheblacklegfungus:Beyondphytotoxinsandphytoalexins.J.Org.Chem.58:4778–4780.27Pedras,M.S.C.,1998a.TowardanunderstandingandcontrolofplantfungaldiseasesinBrassicaceae.Rec.Res.Dev.Agric.FoodChem.2:513–532.28Pedras,M.S.C.,1998b.Phytoalexinsfromcrucifers:Mimickingorovercomingplantchemicaldefenses.Rec.Res.Dev.Phytochem.2:259–267.29Pedras,M.S.C.,andBiesenthal,C.J.,1998a.ProductionofthehostselectivetoxinphomalidebyisolatesofLeptosphaeriamaculansanditscorrelationwithsirodesminPLproduction.Can.J.Microbiol.44:547–553.30Pedras,M.S.C.,Smith,K.C.,andTaylor,J.L.,1998b.Productionof2,5-dioxopiperazinebyanewisolatetypeoftheblacklegfungusPhomalingam.Phytochemistry49:1575–1577.31Pedras,M.S.C.,andOkanga,F.I.,1999.Strategiesofcruciferouspathogenicfungi:Detoxificationofthephytoalexincyclobrassininbymimicry.J.Agric.FoodChem.47:1196–1202.32Pedras,M.S.C.,Erosa-Lopez,C.C.,Quail,J.W.,andTaylor,J.L.,1999.Phomalairdenone:Anewhost-selectivephytotoxinfromavirulenttypeoftheblacklegfungusPhomalingam.Bioorg.Med.Chem.Lett.9:3291–3294.33Pedras,M.S.C.,2001.Phytotoxinsfromfungicausingblacklegdiseaseoncrucifers:Isolation,structuredetermination,detection,andphytotoxicactivity.Rec.Res.Dev.Phytochem.,inpress.34Pedras,M.S.C.,andBiesenthal,C.J.,2000a.HPLCanalysesofculturesofPhomaspp.:Differentiationamonggroupsandspeciesthroughsecondarymetaboliteprofiles.Can.J.Microbiol.46:685–691.35Pedras,M.S.C.,andBiesenthal,C.J.,2000b.Vitalstainingofplantcellsuspensioncultures:EvaluationofthephytotoxicactivitiesofthephytotoxinsphomalideanddestruxinB.PlantCellRep.19:1135–1138.36Petrie,G.A.,1995.EffectsofchemicalsonascosporeproductionbyLeptosphaeriamaculansonblackleg-infectedcanolastubbleinSaskatchewan.CanadianPlantDiseaseSurvey.75:1.37Rawlinson,C.J.,Muthyalu,G.,andCayleyG.R.,1984.Fungicideeffectsonlightleafspot,canker,cropgrowthandyiekdofwinteroil-seedrape.GreatBritain.103,613-628.38Rempel,C.B.,andHall,R.,1995.Effectoftimeandrateofapplicationoftriazolefungicidesonincidenceandseverityofblacklegandgrowthandyieldofcanola.DepartmentofEnvironmentalBiology.N1G2W1:5.39Rouxel,T.,Sarniguet,A.,Kollmann,A.,andBosquet,J.F.,1989.AccumulationofaphytoalexininBrassicaspp.inrelationtoahypersensitiveresponsetoLeptosphaeriamaculans.Physiol.Mol.PlantPathol.34:507–517.40Rouxel,T.,Kollmann,A.,Boulidard,L.,andMithen,R.,1991.AbioticelicitationofindolephytoalexinsandresistancetoLeptosphaeriamaculanswithinBrassiceae.Planta184:271–278.41Salisbury,P.A.,Ballinger,D.J.,Wratten,N.,Plummer,K.M.,andHowlett,B.J.,1995.BlacklegdiseaseonoilseedBrassicainAustralia:Areview.Aust.J.Exp.Agric.35:665–672.42Sosnowski,M.,Ramsey,M.,andScott,E.S.,1999.HostpathogeninteractionsbetweenLeptosphaeriamaculansandcanola.Proceedingsofthe10thInternationalRapeseedCongress,Canberra,Australia.43Tewari,J.P.,Shinners,T.C.,andBriggs,K.G.,1997.ProductionofcalciumoxalatecrystalsbytwospeciesofCyathusincultureandininfestedplantdebris.VerlagderZeitschriftfuÈrNaturforschung52c:421-425.44Williams,R.H.,andFitt,B.D.L.,1999.DifferentiatingAandBgroupsofLeptosphaeriamaculans,causalagentofstemcanker(blackleg)ofoilseedrape.PlantPathology48:161–175.45West,J.S.,Biddulph,J.E.,Fitt,B.D.L.,andGladders,P.,1999.EpidemiologyofLeptosphaeriamaculansinrelationtoforecastingstemcankerseverityonwinteroilseedrapeintheUK.AnnalsofAppliedBiology135:535-546.46West,J.S.,Fitt,P.K.,Leech,P.K.,Biddulph,J.E.,Huang,Y.J.,andBalesdent,M.H.,2002.EffectsoftimingofLeptosphaeriamaculansascosporereleaseandfungicideregimeonPhomaleafspotandPhomastemcankerdevelopmentonwinteroilseedrape(Brassicanapus)insouthernEngland.PlantPathology51:454-463.  國圖紙本論文 連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結註:此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝! 推文 網路書籤 推薦 評分 引用網址 轉寄                                                                                                                                                                                                                    top 相關論文 相關期刊 熱門點閱論文 無相關論文   無相關期刊   1. 臺灣牛皮葉衣屬地衣之分類 2. Phytophthoranicotianae引起之綬草疫病及及其病害防治 3. 電影作品《我,十九歲》創作論述 4. 電影作品《理髮先生》創作論述 5. 人臉與骨架追蹤的漫畫風格即時成像技術之研究 6. 歷史顯像 7. 社區藝文活動探討居民生活美學經驗,以樹梅坑溪環境藝術行動為例 8. 視障者的視覺藝術經驗:以僕域公益文化創意中心之羊毛氈課程為主題 9. 後設認知策略在國中視覺藝術教學應用之研究 10. 問題導向式學習融入高中視覺藝術課程對學生批判思考能力影響之研究 11. 視覺思考融入國中視覺藝術教學之行動研究─以畢卡索作品為例 12. 日治時期臺中州初等教育學校建築研究 13. 苗族傳統木構住宅之研究~以范氏、姚氏吊腳樓為例 14. 中國國家話劇院品牌經營策略研究 15. 盧炎《長笛與鋼琴二重奏》之分析與詮釋     簡易查詢 | 進階查詢 | 熱門排行 | 我的研究室



請為這篇文章評分?