研究中的本體論、認識論、方法論和方法論簡化! (Ontology ...
文章推薦指數: 80 %
... 本體論、認識論、方法論和方法論簡化! (Ontology, Epistemology, Methodology and Methods in ... Studentslearningaboutresearchareexpectedtolearnwhatontology,epistemologyandmethodologymean.InthisvideoIamgoingtoexplainandsimplifythesetermsforyou.Beforeweevengetintoityoumaybeaskingyourself:Whydoweaskstudentstolearnthisstuff?Studentsneedtolearnthesetermsandhowtheyapplytoresearchsotheycanlookatastudyanddecideforthemselvesifitmakessense.Onceyouunderstandityoucancritiqueitandmakebetterdecisionsaboutwhatshouldbeappliedtoyourpractice.Ontologyisafancywordforbeliefsaboutreality.Differentkindsofresearcharefoundedondifferentbeliefsaboutwhatwethinktruthis.Doyouthinkthattruthevenexists?Whatistrue?Whatwethinkrealityiswillshapewhatwethinkwecanknowaboutreality.Thatiswhyitisimportanttounderstandontologywhenyouarelearningaboutandcritiquingresearch.Philosophiesaboutrealitycanbedividedindifferentways.Whenyouarejuststartingtolearnaboutresearchithelpstounderstandthetwotypesofontologythatareessentiallyopposites:RealismandRelativism.Onceyouunderstandthesetwotypesofontologyyoucanmoreeasilyunderstandothers.InthisvideoIamonlygoingtotalkaboutrealismandrelativism,butinmybookIalsotalkaboutcriticalrealismandhistoricalrealismastheyapplytodifferentapproachestoresearch.Firstlet'stalkaboutrealism.Inanutshellrealistsbelievethatonetruthexists.Truthdoesnotchange.Realistsbelievethatthetruthcanbediscoveredusingobjectivemeasurements.Onceyoufindoutwhatthetruthisyoucangeneralizeittoothersituations.Ifyoucanwrapyourheadaroundthisviewofreality,evenifyoudon’ttotallyagreewithit,youwillunderstandwhyresearchthatisbasedonthisviewofrealityisdesignedthewaythatitis.Ifthisiswhattheresearcherthinksaboutrealityitwillinfluenceeverysingledecisionthatismadeinthestudy.Theoppositeviewofrealityiscalledrelativism.IfyoulookatwhatIjustsaidaboutrealismyoucanprobablyguessthateverythingrelativistsbelieveistheexactoppositeofwhatrealistsbelieve.Usingthatlogicyouknowthatrelativistsbelieveinmultipleversionsofreality-whatisrealdependsonthemeaningyouattachtotruth.Truthdoesnotexistwithoutmeaning.Sincerealityiscreatedbyhowweseethingsitevolvesandchangesdependingonyourexperiences.Ifrealityiscontextbounditcannotbegeneralized.Itcanonlybetransferredtoothersimilarcontexts.Epistemologyisanotherfancywordthatbasicallymeanswhatrelationshiptheresearcherhaswiththeresearch.So,howdowegetknowledge?Howdowediscovernewthings?Ontologicalbeliefswilldictateepistemologicalbeliefs.Letmesaythatagaininanotherway.Whattheresearcherbelievesaboutthenatureofrealitywilldictatethekindofrelationshiptheythinktheresearchershouldhavewithwhateverisbeingstudied.Therearetwobasicsetsofbeliefsabouthowweshouldgathernewknowledge.Someresearchersbelievethatresearchshouldbedoneinanobjectivewaysothattheresearcherdoesnotinfluencethedatathatisgathered.Theythinkthatinordertofindoutwhatthetruthistheresearcherneedstostayasfarawayfromtheresearchastheycansothattheycangetanobjectivemeasurement.Thisapproachisalsoknownasaneticapproachtoresearch.Thewordeticbasicallymeanstakinganoutsider’sviewofsomeoneelse’ssituation.So,ifyouuseafishbowltorepresentsomeone’ssituationthatisbeingresearchedtheresearchertakinganeticapproachwouldwanttolookatthefishbowlfromtheoutside,measureitandmakeobservationswithoutevertouchingit.Ifwegobacktolookatthetwomajoropposingviewsofreality,whichonedoyouthinkleadstothiseticapproachtoconductingresearch?Thatisright,realism!Ifyouthinkthattruthexiststhatcanbeobjectivelymeasuredthenofcourseyouwanttostandback,lookatyourfishbowlandtrytomeasureitwithoutdisturbingtherealityyouarestudying.Theoppositeapproachtoresearchwouldbetakinganemicapproach.Anemicapproachisusedbyresearchersthatbelieveinasubjectiveapproachtoreality.Interactingwithpeopletofindoutwhattruthmeanstothemisneeded.Sotheseresearcherswouldwanttogetinsidethefishbowl.Thepotentialinfluenceoftheresearcheronwhatisbeingresearchedisacknowledged,sometimesavoidedorsometimesevenembraced.Interactionisseenasanecessarythingtogainin-depthunderstandingsofwhatisgoingon.Whatontologydoyouthinkleadstothiswaytoapproachingresearch?Thatisright,relativism!Rememberthatrelativistsbelievethatthetruthiscreatedbymeaningsandexperiences.Inordertounderstandsomeone’sexperienceandthecontextthatshapedityouneedtodigdeepandtalktothem.Methodologyisanotherfancywordthatmeanshowknowledgeisdiscoveredandanalysedinasystematicway.Don’tconfusemethodologywithmethods.Yes,theyarecloselyrelatedbutthetermmethodologyreferstophilosophiesthatguidehowknowledgeshouldbegathered.Thetermmethods,ontheotherhand,isspecifictoadatagatheringtechniqueslikeinterviewsorsurveys.Methodologycanbedividedbasedontheontologicalandepistemologicalbeliefsthatledtothem.ForthepurposesofthisvideoIwantyoutotakeaguesswhatontologyandepistemologywouldbelinkedtoanexperimentalmethodology.Letmegiveyouahint.Thepurposeofanexperimentistoprovethatonethingcausedanother.Thatisright,experimentsaredesignedtodiscoverthetruthsotheyarebasedonarealistontologyandaneticepistemology.Howcanyoutell?Well,theyarelookingforonetruth.Themethodologybehindexperimentalresearchisbuiltontheideathatdatashouldbediscoveredandanalysedinanobjectiveway.Sincetheyarewantingtobeobjectivetheyarelookingatthetopicfromtheoutside,whichmeanstheyareusinganeticepistemology.Theexperimentalmethodologyisplannedinadvancetoeliminatetheinfluenceofasmanycontextualfactorsaspossiblesincetheonlywaytheseresearchersbelievethattruthcanbediscoveredistoremoveitfromit’scontext.Quantitativeresearcherswanttomakegeneralizationsbasedontheirresults.Anexperimentusesadeductiveapproachtoanalysis.Thatmeansthatthestudywillstartwithatheory.Fromthattheoryhypotheseswillbedeveloped.Younormallyseethehypothesesexplicitlystatedatthebeginningofthemethodologysectionorjustbeforeit.Thesehypothesesarethentested.Specificdataiscollectedandanalysedtoeitherproveordisprovetheoriginalhypothesis.Sincetheexperimentalresearchisdesignedtobeobjectivethemethodsinanexperimentwilllikelyincludesurveysandotherobjectivemeasurementslikeweight,height,bloodpressureandsoon.Howaboutanotherexample.Whatontologicalandepistemologicalbeliefsleadtoaphenomenologicalstudy?Letmegiveyouanotherhint…phenomenologyisdesignedtoexplorelivedexperiences.Oftenresearcherswilldoin-depthinterviewswithpeopletocollectinformationandunderstandthecontextoftheexperience.Ihopeyoupickeduponthekeywordsinthatquestion.Experiences,in-depth,interviews,context…allofthesewordsonlymakesenseiftheresearcherisusingarelativistontology.Thefactthatinterviewsarebeingdonetoexploreandunderstandthecontextofasituationmeansanemicepistemologyisbeingused.Inaphenomenologicalmethodologyresearchdesigndecisionsaremadebasedoncomplexphilosophiesabouthowdatashouldbecollectedandanalysed.Butbasicallytheystarttalkingtoparticipantstogatherasmuchspecificinformationastheycanaboutasituation.Thentheylookforpatternsorcommonfindingsintheirdata.Fromthosepatternstentativehypothesesarecreatedeventhoughtheyarenotusuallylabeledashypothesesintheactualstudybecausethatisaquantitativeterm.Thesehypothesesareusedtopromotemoreresearchandeventuallygeneralconclusionsortheoriesaredeveloped.Whenresultsarepresentedtheyarealwayslinkedtothecontextthatwasstudied.Thiskindoflogicthatismostcommonly(butnotalways)associatedwithqualitativeresearchiscalledinductivereasoning.Remember,yourontologydictatesyourepistemologywhichdictatesyourmethodologywhichdictatesyourmethods.Allofthisneedstomakesenseforthequestionyouareaskingsinceinrealitythequestiondriveseverything.Ifyoucanunderstandthebasicsofrealismandrelativismyoucanuselogictomatcheverythingelseaboutresearchepistemologyandmethodologytotheappropriateparadigmaslongasyouknowwhattheothertermsmean.Let’ssayyouarelookingatanotherarticleandyounoticethattheyaredescribingpatternsamongalargegroupofpeopleusingstatistics.Ifyouhadtoguess,whatdoyouthinktheontologyandepistemologythatleadtothisapproachis?Mosttimesthearticlewillexplicitlytellyouifitisquantitativeorqualitative,butsometimesitwon’t.Anotherwaytotellifyourmethodologyisquantitativeorqualitativeinnatureistolookattheuseofstatisticsandthesamplesize.Typicallyquantitativeresearchusesstatisticsandlargesamplesizes.Qualitativeresearchontheotherhandusessmallersamplesizesandthematicanalysis.Sometimesitismorecomplicatedthanthatsomakesureyoulookbeyondthesampleandstatisticstoconfirmyourguess.Doyouthinkthatmakessensebasedonwhatwehavediscussedsofar?Pleasecommentbelowtoletmeknowifyoucanmakesenseofthereasoning.Ihopeyouhavefoundthisvideohelpful.Formoreaboutthebasicsofthiscomplexterminologypleasereadmybookandletmeknowifyouhaveanyotherquestions.Ialsohaveafewothervideosaboutresearchphilosophyyoumightwanttocheckout.Sometimesallyouneedtodotounderstandsomethingistohearitexplainedinafewdifferentways.ThatiswhyIhavemultiplevideosonthistopic.IfyoutakeamomenttoexploremychannelyouwillseethatIhaveothervideosonthissametopicthatexplainthingsinotherways.Ifyoulikemyvideospleasepressthelikebuttonandsubscribetobenotifiedwhennewvideosarereleased.Studentslearningaboutresearchareexpectedtolearnwhatontology,epistemologyandmethodology x1.0 x0.5 x0.75 x1.0 x1.5 影片重複 字級大小 快速鍵 返回 175% 150% 125% 100% 90% 字幕與單字 影片操作你可以在這邊進行「影片」的調整,以及「字幕」的顯示 Back Next B1中級 研究中的本體論、認識論、方法論和方法論簡化!(Ontology,Epistemology,MethodologyandMethodsinResearchSimplified!) 1107 WangLijing 發佈於 2021年01月14日 更多分享 分享 收藏 回報 影片單字
延伸文章資訊
- 1本體論、認識論和方法論 - 每日頭條
本體論、認識論和方法論既是哲學研究的三個基本方向,也是哲學領域中三個不同層次的問題。本體論是認識論的基礎,認識論是本體論的發展與應用;同樣, ...
- 2第三章研究方法 - 政大機構典藏
一個研究者對於方法. 論問題的回答,必然會受到「本體論/認識論」立場的限制,不能隨意選擇任何. 一種方法論。而科學研究的主要任務,就是設法將吾人對外在世界之實在性的 ...
- 3不只做一位「教育工程師」—量與質的研究方法評析 - 臺灣教育 ...
既然「本體. 論」上的沒有真實本質,此時「認識論」. 的目標就在於理解這個制度、這個規則. 和理論到底是誰建構出來的?「方法論」. 上特別強調意識形態的批判,反思權力.
- 4論文筆記(一):本體論、認識論、方法論與研究方法
參考文獻以曾仁杰(2004)《邁向復元之路— 優勢觀點社會工作處遇關係之內涵與歷程研究》為主,合併其他參考論文。 什麼是本體論? 本體論(ontology)就是 ...
- 5實証論的本體論、知識論、方法論 - Devil Red - 痞客邦
實證論以科學方法所探求的到的為智識研究的範圍。 4.認識標準的問題-以一貫說、相應說為例此問題在探求真實和偽妄的問題,例如持一貫 ...