Economies of scale - Wikipedia
文章推薦指數: 80 %
In microeconomics, economies of scale are the cost advantages that enterprises obtain due to their scale of operation, and are typically measured by the ...
Economiesofscale
FromWikipedia,thefreeencyclopedia
Jumptonavigation
Jumptosearch
Costadvantagesobtainedviascaleofoperation
AsquantityofproductionincreasesfromQtoQ2,theaveragecostofeachunitdecreasesfromCtoC1.LRACisthelong-runaveragecost
Inmicroeconomics,economiesofscalearethecostadvantagesthatenterprisesobtainduetotheirscaleofoperation,andaretypicallymeasuredbytheamountofoutputproducedperunitoftime.Adecreaseincostperunitofoutputenablesanincreaseinscale.Atthebasisofeconomiesofscale,theremaybetechnical,statistical,organizationalorrelatedfactorstothedegreeofmarketcontrol.Thisisjustapartialdescriptionoftheconcept.
Economiesofscaleapplytoavarietyoftheorganizationalandbusinesssituationsandatvariouslevels,suchasaproduction,plantoranentireenterprise.Whenaveragecostsstartfallingasoutputincreases,theneconomiesofscaleoccur.
Someeconomiesofscale,suchascapitalcostofmanufacturingfacilitiesandfrictionlossoftransportationandindustrialequipment,haveaphysicalorengineeringbasis.
TheeconomicconceptdatesbacktoAdamSmithandtheideaofobtaininglargerproductionreturnsthroughtheuseofdivisionoflabor.[1]Diseconomiesofscalearetheopposite.
Economiesofscaleoftenhavelimits,suchaspassingtheoptimumdesignpointwherecostsperadditionalunitbegintoincrease.Commonlimitsincludeexceedingthenearbyrawmaterialsupply,suchaswoodinthelumber,pulpandpaperindustry.Acommonlimitforalowcostperunitweightcommoditiesissaturatingtheregionalmarket,thushavingtoshipproductuneconomicdistances.Otherlimitsincludeusingenergylessefficientlyorhavingahigherdefectrate.
Largeproducersareusuallyefficientatlongrunsofaproductgrade(acommodity)andfinditcostlytoswitchgradesfrequently.Theywill,therefore,avoidspecialtygradeseventhoughtheyhavehighermargins.Oftensmaller(usuallyolder)manufacturingfacilitiesremainviablebychangingfromcommodity-gradeproductiontospecialtyproducts.[a][2]
Economiesofscalemustbedistinguishedfromeconomiesstemmingfromanincreaseintheproductionofagivenplant.Whenaplantisusedbelowitsoptimalproductioncapacity,increasesinitsdegreeofutilizationbringaboutdecreasesinthetotalaveragecostofproduction.Asnoticed,amongtheothers,byNicholasGeorgescu-Roegen(1966)andNicholasKaldor(1972)theseeconomiesarenoteconomiesofscale.
Contents
1Overview
2Determinantsofeconomiesofscale
2.1Physicalandengineeringbasis:economiesofincreaseddimension
2.2Economiesinholdingstocksandreserves
2.3Transactioneconomies
2.4Economiesderivingfromthebalancingofproductioncapacity
2.5Economiesresultingfromthedivisionoflabourandtheuseofsuperiortechniques
2.6Managerialeconomics
2.7Learningandgrowtheconomies
2.8Capitalandoperatingcost
2.9Crewsizeandotheroperatingcostsforships,trainsandairplanes
2.10Economicaluseofbyproducts
2.11Economiesofscaleandthesizeofexporter
3Economiesofscaleandreturnstoscale
4Economiesofscaleinthehistoryofeconomicanalysis
4.1Economiesofscaleinclassicaleconomists
4.2EconomiesofscaleinMarxanddistributionalconsequences
4.3EconomiesofscaleinMarshall
4.4Sraffa'scritique
4.5Economiesofscaleandthetendencytowardsmonopoly:"Cournot'sdilemma"
5Externaleconomiesofscale
6Sources
6.1Purchasing
6.2Managerial
6.3Technological
7Seealso
8Notes
9References
9.1Citations
9.2Generalandcitedreferences
10Externallinks
Overview[edit]
Thesimplemeaningofeconomiesofscaleisdoingthingsmoreefficientlywithincreasingsize.[3]Commonsourcesofeconomiesofscalearepurchasing(bulkbuyingofmaterialsthroughlong-termcontracts),managerial(increasingthespecializationofmanagers),financial(obtaininglower-interestchargeswhenborrowingfrombanksandhavingaccesstoagreaterrangeoffinancialinstruments),marketing(spreadingthecostofadvertisingoveragreaterrangeofoutputinmediamarkets),andtechnological(takingadvantageofreturnstoscaleintheproductionfunction).Eachofthesefactorsreducesthelongrunaveragecosts(LRAC)ofproductionbyshiftingtheshort-runaveragetotalcost(SRATC)curvedownandtotheright.
Economiesofscaleisaconceptthatmayexplainpatternsininternationaltradeorinthenumberoffirmsinagivenmarket.Theexploitationofeconomiesofscalehelpsexplainwhycompaniesgrowlargeinsomeindustries.Itisalsoajustificationforfreetradepolicies,sincesomeeconomiesofscalemayrequirealargermarketthanispossiblewithinaparticularcountry—forexample,itwouldnotbeefficientforLiechtensteintohaveitsowncarmakeriftheyonlysoldtotheirlocalmarket.Alonecarmakermaybeprofitable,butevenmoresoiftheyexportedcarstoglobalmarketsinadditiontosellingtothelocalmarket.Economiesofscalealsoplayaroleina"naturalmonopoly".Thereisadistinctionbetweentwotypesofeconomiesofscale:internalandexternal.Anindustrythatexhibitsaninternaleconomyofscaleisonewherethecostsofproductionfallwhenthenumberoffirmsintheindustrydrops,buttheremainingfirmsincreasetheirproductiontomatchpreviouslevels.Conversely,anindustryexhibitsanexternaleconomyofscalewhencostsdropduetotheintroductionofmorefirms,thusallowingformoreefficientuseofspecializedservicesandmachinery.
Determinantsofeconomiesofscale[edit]
Physicalandengineeringbasis:economiesofincreaseddimension[edit]
Someoftheeconomiesofscalerecognizedinengineeringhaveaphysicalbasis,suchasthesquare–cubelaw,bywhichthesurfaceofavesselincreasesbythesquareofthedimensionswhilethevolumeincreasesbythecube.Thislawhasadirecteffectonthecapitalcostofsuchthingsasbuildings,factories,pipelines,shipsandairplanes.[b]
Instructuralengineering,thestrengthofbeamsincreaseswiththecubeofthethickness.
Draglossofvehicleslikeaircraftorshipsgenerallyincreaseslessthanproportionalwithincreasingcargovolume,althoughthephysicaldetailscanbequitecomplicated.Therefore,makingthemlargerusuallyresultsinlessfuelconsumptionpertonofcargoatagivenspeed.
Heatlossfromindustrialprocessesvaryperunitofvolumeforpipes,tanksandothervesselsinarelationshipsomewhatsimilartothesquare–cubelaw.[c][4]Insomeproductions,anincreaseinthesizeoftheplantreducestheaveragevariablecost,thankstotheenergysavingsresultingfromthelowerdispersionofheat.
Economiesofincreaseddimensionareoftenmisinterpretedbecauseoftheconfusionbetweenindivisibilityandthree-dimensionalityofspace.Thisconfusionarisesfromthefactthatthree-dimensionalproductionelements,suchaspipesandovens,onceinstalledandoperating,arealwaystechnicallyindivisible.However,theeconomiesofscaleduetotheincreaseinsizedonotdependonindivisibilitybutexclusivelyonthethree-dimensionalityofspace.Indeed,indivisibilityonlyentailstheexistenceofeconomiesofscaleproducedbythebalancingofproductivecapacities,consideredabove;orofincreasingreturnsintheutilisationofasingleplant,duetoitsmoreefficientuseasthequantityproducedincreases.However,thislatterphenomenonhasnothingtodowiththeeconomiesofscalewhich,bydefinition,arelinkedtotheuseofalargerplant.[5]
Economiesinholdingstocksandreserves[edit]
Atthebaseofeconomiesofscaletherearealsoreturnstoscalelinkedtostatisticalfactors.Infact,thegreaterofthenumberofresourcesinvolved,thesmaller,inproportion,isthequantityofreservesnecessarytocopewithunforeseencontingencies(forinstance,machinespareparts,inventories,circulatingcapital,etc.).[6]
Transactioneconomies[edit]
Alargerscalegenerallydeterminesgreaterbargainingpoweroverinputpricesandthereforebenefitsfrompecuniaryeconomiesintermsofpurchasingrawmaterialsandintermediategoodscomparedtocompaniesthatmakeordersforsmalleramounts.Inthiscase,wespeakofpecuniaryeconomies,tohighlightthefactthatnothingchangesfromthe"physical"pointofviewofthereturnstoscale.Furthermore,supplycontractsentailfixedcostswhichleadtodecreasingaveragecostsifthescaleofproductionincreases.[7]Thisisofimportantutilityinthestudyofcorporatefinance.[8]
Economiesderivingfromthebalancingofproductioncapacity[edit]
Economiesofproductivecapacitybalancingderivesfromthepossibilitythatalargerscaleofproductioninvolvesamoreefficientuseoftheproductioncapacitiesoftheindividualphasesoftheproductionprocess.Iftheinputsareindivisibleandcomplementary,asmallscalemaybesubjecttoidletimesortotheunderutilizationoftheproductivecapacityofsomesub-processes.Ahigherproductionscalecanmakethedifferentproductioncapacitiescompatible.Thereductioninmachineryidletimesiscrucialinthecaseofahighcostofmachinery.[9]
Economiesresultingfromthedivisionoflabourandtheuseofsuperiortechniques[edit]
Alargerscaleallowsforamoreefficientdivisionoflabour.Theeconomiesofdivisionoflabourderivefromtheincreaseinproductionspeed,fromthepossibilityofusingspecializedpersonnelandadoptingmoreefficienttechniques.Anincreaseinthedivisionoflabourinevitablyleadstochangesinthequalityofinputsandoutputs.[10]
Managerialeconomics[edit]
Manyadministrativeandorganizationalactivitiesaremostlycognitiveand,therefore,largelyindependentofthescaleofproduction.[11]Whenthesizeofthecompanyandthedivisionoflabourincrease,thereareanumberofadvantagesduetothepossibilityofmakingorganizationalmanagementmoreeffectiveandperfectingaccountingandcontroltechniques.[12]Furthermore,theproceduresandroutinesthatturnedouttobethebestcanbereproducedbymanagersatdifferenttimesandplaces.
Learningandgrowtheconomies[edit]
Learningandgrowtheconomiesareatthebaseofdynamiceconomiesofscale,associatedwiththeprocessofgrowthofthescaledimensionandnottothedimensionofscaleperse.Learningbydoingimpliesimprovementsintheabilitytoperformandpromotestheintroductionofincrementalinnovationswithaprogressiveloweringofaveragecosts.[13]Learningeconomiesaredirectlyproportionaltothecumulativeproduction(experiencecurve).
Growtheconomiesoccurwhenacompanyacquiresanadvantagebyincreasingitssize.Theseeconomiesareduetothepresenceofsomeresourceorcompetencethatisnotfullyutilized,ortotheexistenceofspecificmarketpositionsthatcreateadifferentialadvantageinexpandingthesizeofthefirms.Thatgrowtheconomiesdisappearoncethescalesizeexpansionprocessiscompleted.Forexample,acompanythatownsasupermarketchainbenefitsfromaneconomyofgrowthif,openinganewsupermarket,itgetsanincreaseinthepriceofthelanditownsaroundthenewsupermarket.Thesaleoftheselandstoeconomicoperators,whowishtoopenshopsnearthesupermarket,allowsthecompanyinquestiontomakeaprofit,makingaprofitontherevaluationofthevalueofbuildingland.[14]
Capitalandoperatingcost[edit]
Overallcostsofcapitalprojectsareknowntobesubjecttoeconomiesofscale.Acrudeestimateisthatifthecapitalcostforagivensizedpieceofequipmentisknown,changingthesizewillchangethecapitalcostbythe0.6powerofthecapacityratio(thepointsixtothepowerrule).[15][d]
Inestimatingcapitalcost,ittypicallyrequiresaninsignificantamountoflabor,andpossiblynotmuchmoreinmaterials,toinstallalargercapacityelectricalwireorpipehavingsignificantlygreatercapacity.[16]
Thecostofaunitofcapacityofmanytypesofequipment,suchaselectricmotors,centrifugalpumps,dieselandgasolineengines,decreasesassizeincreases.Also,theefficiencyincreaseswithsize.[17]
Crewsizeandotheroperatingcostsforships,trainsandairplanes[edit]
Operatingcrewsizeforships,airplanes,trains,etc.,doesnotincreaseindirectproportiontocapacity.[18](Operatingcrewconsistsofpilots,co-pilots,navigators,etc.anddoesnotincludepassengerservicepersonnel.)Manyaircraftmodelsweresignificantlylengthenedor"stretched"toincreasepayload.[19]
Manymanufacturingfacilities,especiallythosemakingbulkmaterialslikechemicals,refinedpetroleumproducts,cementandpaper,havelaborrequirementsthatarenotgreatlyinfluencedbychangesinplantcapacity.Thisisbecauselaborrequirementsofautomatedprocessestendtobebasedonthecomplexityoftheoperationratherthanproductionrate,andmanymanufacturingfacilitieshavenearlythesamebasicnumberofprocessingstepsandpiecesofequipment,regardlessofproductioncapacity.
Economicaluseofbyproducts[edit]
KarlMarxnotedthatlargescalemanufacturingallowedeconomicaluseofproductsthatwouldotherwisebewaste.[20]Marxcitedthechemicalindustryasanexample,whichtodayalongwithpetrochemicals,remainshighlydependentonturningvariousresidualreactantstreamsintosalableproducts.Inthepulpandpaperindustry,itiseconomicaltoburnbarkandfinewoodparticlestoproduceprocesssteamandtorecoverthespentpulpingchemicalsforconversionbacktoausableform.
Economiesofscaleandthesizeofexporter[edit]
Largeandmoreproductivefirmstypicallygenerateenoughnetrevenuesabroadtocoverthefixedcostsassociatedwithexporting.[21]However,intheeventoftradeliberalization,resourceswillhavetobereallocatedtowardthemoreproductivefirm,whichraisestheaverageproductivitywithintheindustry.[22]
Firmsdifferintheirlaborproductivityandthequalityoftheirgoodsproduced.Itisbecauseofthisthatmoreefficientfirmsaremorelikelytogeneratemorenetincomeabroadandthusbecomeexportersoftheirgoodsorservices.Thereisacorrelatingrelationshipbetweenafirms'totalsalesandunderlyingefficiency.Firmswithhigherproductivitywillalwaysoutperformafirmwithlowerproductivitywhichwillleadtolowersales.Throughtradeliberalization,organizationsareabletodroptheirtradecostsduetoexportgrowth.However,tradeliberalizationdoesnotaccountforanytariffreductionorshippinglogisticsimprovement.[22]However,totaleconomiesofscaleisbasedontheexportersindividualfrequencyandsize.Solarge-scalecompaniesaremorelikelytohavealowercostperunitasopposedtosmall-scalecompanies.Likewise,hightradefrequencycompaniesareabletoreducetheiroverallcostattributedperunitwhencomparedtothoseoflow-tradefrequencycompanies.[23]
Economiesofscaleandreturnstoscale[edit]
Economiesofscaleisrelatedtoandcaneasilybeconfusedwiththetheoreticaleconomicnotionofreturnstoscale.Whereeconomiesofscalerefertoafirm'scosts,returnstoscaledescribetherelationshipbetweeninputsandoutputsinalong-run(allinputsvariable)productionfunction.Aproductionfunctionhasconstantreturnstoscaleifincreasingallinputsbysomeproportionresultsinoutputincreasingbythatsameproportion.Returnsaredecreasingif,say,doublinginputsresultsinlessthandoubletheoutput,andincreasingifmorethandoubletheoutput.Ifamathematicalfunctionisusedtorepresenttheproductionfunction,andifthatproductionfunctionishomogeneous,returnstoscalearerepresentedbythedegreeofhomogeneityofthefunction.Homogeneousproductionfunctionswithconstantreturnstoscalearefirstdegreehomogeneous,increasingreturnstoscalearerepresentedbydegreesofhomogeneitygreaterthanone,anddecreasingreturnstoscalebydegreesofhomogeneitylessthanone.
Ifthefirmisaperfectcompetitorinallinputmarkets,andthustheper-unitpricesofallitsinputsareunaffectedbyhowmuchoftheinputsthefirmpurchases,thenitcanbeshownthatataparticularlevelofoutput,thefirmhaseconomiesofscaleifandonlyifithasincreasingreturnstoscale,hasdiseconomiesofscaleifandonlyifithasdecreasingreturnstoscale,andhasneithereconomiesnordiseconomiesofscaleifithasconstantreturnstoscale.[24][25][26]Inthiscase,withperfectcompetitionintheoutputmarketthelong-runequilibriumwillinvolveallfirmsoperatingattheminimumpointoftheirlong-runaveragecostcurves(i.e.,attheborderlinebetweeneconomiesanddiseconomiesofscale).
If,however,thefirmisnotaperfectcompetitorintheinputmarkets,thentheaboveconclusionsaremodified.Forexample,ifthereareincreasingreturnstoscaleinsomerangeofoutputlevels,butthefirmissobiginoneormoreinputmarketsthatincreasingitspurchasesofaninputdrivesuptheinput'sper-unitcost,thenthefirmcouldhavediseconomiesofscaleinthatrangeofoutputlevels.Conversely,ifthefirmisabletogetbulkdiscountsofaninput,thenitcouldhaveeconomiesofscaleinsomerangeofoutputlevelsevenifithasdecreasingreturnsinproductioninthatoutputrange.
Inessence,returnstoscalerefertothevariationintherelationshipbetweeninputsandoutput.Thisrelationshipisthereforeexpressedin"physical"terms.Butwhentalkingabouteconomiesofscale,therelationtakenintoconsiderationisthatbetweentheaverageproductioncostandthedimensionofscale.Economiesofscalethereforeareaffectedbyvariationsininputprices.Ifinputpricesremainthesameastheirquantitiespurchasedbythefirmincrease,thenotionsofincreasingreturnstoscaleandeconomiesofscalecanbeconsideredequivalent.However,ifinputpricesvaryinrelationtotheirquantitiespurchasedbythecompany,itisnecessarytodistinguishbetweenreturnstoscaleandeconomiesofscale.Theconceptofeconomiesofscaleismoregeneralthanthatofreturnstoscalesinceitincludesthepossibilityofchangesinthepriceofinputswhenthequantitypurchasedofinputsvarieswithchangesinthescaleofproduction.[27]
Theliteratureassumedthatduetothecompetitivenatureofreverseauctions,andinordertocompensateforlowerpricesandlowermargins,suppliersseekhighervolumestomaintainorincreasethetotalrevenue.Buyers,inturn,benefitfromthelowertransactioncostsandeconomiesofscalethatresultfromlargervolumes.Inpartasaresult,numerousstudieshaveindicatedthattheprocurementvolumemustbesufficientlyhightoprovidesufficientprofitstoattractenoughsuppliers,andprovidebuyerswithenoughsavingstocovertheiradditionalcosts.[28]
However,surprisinglyenough,ShalevandAsbjornsefound,intheirresearchbasedon139reverseauctionsconductedinthepublicsectorbypublicsectorbuyers,thatthehigherauctionvolume,oreconomiesofscale,didnotleadtobettersuccessoftheauction.Theyfoundthatauctionvolumedidnotcorrelatewithcompetition,norwiththenumberofbidders,suggestingthatauctionvolumedoesnotpromoteadditionalcompetition.Theynoted,however,thattheirdataincludedawiderangeofproducts,andthedegreeofcompetitionineachmarketvariedsignificantly,andofferthatfurtherresearchonthisissueshouldbeconductedtodeterminewhetherthesefindingsremainthesamewhenpurchasingthesameproductforbothsmallandhighvolumes.Keepingcompetitivefactorsconstant,increasingauctionvolumemayfurtherincreasecompetition.[28]
Economiesofscaleinthehistoryofeconomicanalysis[edit]
Economiesofscaleinclassicaleconomists[edit]
Thefirstsystematicanalysisoftheadvantagesofthedivisionoflabourcapableofgeneratingeconomiesofscale,bothinastaticanddynamicsense,wasthatcontainedinthefamousFirstBookofWealthofNations(1776)byAdamSmith,generallyconsideredthefounderofpoliticaleconomyasanautonomousdiscipline.
JohnStuartMill,inChapterIXoftheFirstBookofhisPrinciples,referringtotheworkofCharlesBabbage(Ontheeconomicsofmachinesandmanufactories),widelyanalysestherelationshipsbetweenincreasingreturnsandscaleofproductionallinsidetheproductionunit.
EconomiesofscaleinMarxanddistributionalconsequences[edit]
InDasKapital(1867),KarlMarx,referringtoCharlesBabbage,extensivelyanalyzedeconomiesofscaleandconcludesthattheyareoneofthefactorsunderlyingtheever-increasingconcentrationofcapital.Marxobservesthatinthecapitalistsystemthetechnicalconditionsoftheworkprocessarecontinuouslyrevolutionizedinordertoincreasethesurplusbyimprovingtheproductiveforceofwork.AccordingtoMarx,withthecooperationofmanyworkersbringsaboutaneconomyintheuseofthemeansofproductionandanincreaseinproductivityduetotheincreaseinthedivisionoflabour.Furthermore,theincreaseinthesizeofthemachineryallowssignificantsavingsinconstruction,installationandoperationcosts.Thetendencytoexploiteconomiesofscaleentailsacontinuousincreaseinthevolumeofproductionwhich,inturn,requiresaconstantexpansionofthesizeofthemarket.[29]However,ifthemarketdoesnotexpandatthesamerateasproductionincreases,overproductioncrisescanoccur.AccordingtoMarxthecapitalistsystemisthereforecharacterizedbytwotendencies,connectedtoeconomiesofscale:towardsagrowingconcentrationandtowardseconomiccrisesduetooverproduction.[30]
Inhis1844EconomicandPhilosophicManuscripts,KarlMarxobservesthateconomiesofscalehavehistoricallybeenassociatedwithanincreasingconcentrationofprivatewealthandhavebeenusedtojustifysuchconcentration.Marxpointsoutthatconcentratedprivateownershipoflarge-scaleeconomicenterprisesisahistoricallycontingentfact,andnotessentialtothenatureofsuchenterprises.Inthecaseofagriculture,forexample,Marxcallsattentiontothesophisticalnatureoftheargumentsusedtojustifythesystemofconcentratedownershipofland:
Asforlargelandedproperty,itsdefendershavealwayssophisticallyidentifiedtheeconomicadvantagesofferedbylarge-scaleagriculturewithlarge-scalelandedproperty,asifitwerenotpreciselyasaresultoftheabolitionofpropertythatthisadvantage,foronething,receiveditsgreatestpossibleextension,and,foranother,onlythenwouldbeofsocialbenefit.[31]
Insteadofconcentratedprivateownershipofland,Marxrecommendsthateconomiesofscaleshouldinsteadberealizedbyassociations:
Association,appliedtoland,sharestheeconomicadvantageoflarge-scalelandedproperty,andfirstbringstorealizationtheoriginaltendencyinherentinland-division,namely,equality.Inthesamewayassociationre-establishes,nowonarationalbasis,nolongermediatedbyserfdom,overlordshipandthesillymysticismofproperty,theintimatetiesofmanwiththeearth,fortheearthceasestobeanobjectofhuckstering,andthroughfreelaborandfreeenjoymentbecomesoncemoreatruepersonalpropertyofman.[31]
EconomiesofscaleinMarshall[edit]
AlfredMarshallnotesthat"some,amongwhomCournothimself,"haveconsidered"theinternaleconomies[...]apparentlywithoutnoticingthattheirpremisesleadinevitablytotheconclusionthat,whateverfirmfirstgetsagoodstartwillobtainamonopolyofthewholebusinessofitstrade…".[32]Marshallbelievesthattherearefactorsthatlimitthistrendtowardmonopoly,andinparticular:
thedeathofthefounderofthefirmandthedifficultythatthesuccessorsmayhaveinheritedhis/herentrepreneurialskills;
thedifficultyofreachingnewmarketsforone'sgoods;
thegrowingdifficultyofbeingabletoadapttochangesindemandandtonewtechniquesofproduction;
Theeffectsofexternaleconomies,thatistheparticulartypeofeconomiesofscaleconnectednottotheproductionscaleofanindividualproductionunit,buttothatofanentiresector.[33]
Sraffa'scritique[edit]
PieroSraffaobservesthatMarshall,inordertojustifytheoperationofthelawofincreasingreturnswithoutitcomingintoconflictwiththehypothesisoffreecompetition,tendedtohighlighttheadvantagesofexternaleconomieslinkedtoanincreaseintheproductionofanentiresectorofactivity.However,"thoseeconomieswhichareexternalfromthepointofviewoftheindividualfirm,butinternalasregardstheindustryinitsaggregate,constitutepreciselytheclasswhichismostseldomtobemetwith.""Inanycase-Sraffanotes–insofarasexternaleconomiesofthekindinquestionexist,theyarenotlinkedtobecalledforthbysmallincreasesinproduction,"asrequiredbythemarginalisttheoryofprice.[34]Sraffapointsoutthat,intheequilibriumtheoryoftheindividualindustries,thepresenceofexternaleconomiescannotplayanimportantrolebecausethistheoryisbasedonmarginalchangesinthequantitiesproduced.
Sraffaconcludesthat,ifthehypothesisofperfectcompetitionismaintained,economiesofscaleshouldbeexcluded.Hethensuggeststhepossibilityofabandoningtheassumptionoffreecompetitiontoaddressthestudyoffirmsthathavetheirownparticularmarket.[35]ThisstimulatedawholeseriesofstudiesonthecasesofimperfectcompetitioninCambridge.However,inthesucceedingyearsSraffafollowedadifferentpathofresearchthatbroughthimtowriteandpublishhismainworkProductionofcommoditiesbymeansofcommodities(Sraffa1966).Inthisbook,Sraffadeterminesrelativepricesassumingnochangesinoutput,sothatnoquestionarisesastothevariationorconstancyofreturns.
Economiesofscaleandthetendencytowardsmonopoly:"Cournot'sdilemma"[edit]
Ithasbeennotedthatinmanyindustrialsectorstherearenumerouscompanieswithdifferentsizesandorganizationalstructures,despitethepresenceofsignificanteconomiesofscale.Thiscontradiction,betweentheempiricalevidenceandthelogicalincompatibilitybetweeneconomiesofscaleandcompetition,hasbeencalledthe‘Cournotdilemma’.[36]AsMarioMorroniobserves,Cournot'sdilemmaappearstobeunsolvableifweonlyconsidertheeffectsofeconomiesofscaleonthedimensionofscale.[37]If,ontheotherhand,theanalysisisexpanded,includingtheaspectsconcerningthedevelopmentofknowledgeandtheorganizationoftransactions,itispossibletoconcludethateconomiesofscaledonotalwaysleadtomonopoly.Infact,thecompetitiveadvantagesderivingfromthedevelopmentofthefirm'scapabilitiesandfromthemanagementoftransactionswithsuppliersandcustomerscancounterbalancethoseprovidedbythescale,thuscounteractingthetendencytowardsamonopolyinherentineconomiesofscale.Inotherwords,theheterogeneityoftheorganizationalformsandofthesizeofthecompaniesoperatinginasectorofactivitycanbedeterminedbyfactorsregardingthequalityoftheproducts,theproductionflexibility,thecontractualmethods,thelearningopportunities,theheterogeneityofpreferencesofcustomerswhoexpressadifferentiateddemandwithrespecttothequalityoftheproduct,andassistancebeforeandafterthesale.Verydifferentorganizationalformscanthereforeco-existinthesamesectorofactivity,eveninthepresenceofeconomiesofscale,suchas,forexample,flexibleproductiononalargescale,small-scaleflexibleproduction,massproduction,industrialproductionbasedonrigidtechnologiesassociatedwithflexibleorganizationalsystemsandtraditionalartisanproduction.Theconsiderationsregardingeconomiesofscalearethereforeimportant,butnotsufficienttoexplainthesizeofthecompanyandthemarketstructure.Itisalsonecessarytotakeintoaccountthefactorslinkedtothedevelopmentofcapabilitiesandthemanagementoftransactioncosts.[37]
Externaleconomiesofscale[edit]
Externaleconomiesofscaletendtobemoreprevalentthaninternaleconomiesofscale.[38]Throughtheexternaleconomiesofscale,theentryofnewfirmsbenefitsallexistingcompetitorsasitcreatesgreatercompetitionandalsoreducestheaveragecostforallfirmsasopposedtointernaleconomiesofscalewhichonlyallowsbenefitstotheindividualfirm.[39]Advantagesthatarisefromexternaleconomiesofscaleinclude;
Expansionoftheindustry.
Benefitsmostorallofthefirmswithintheindustry.
Canleadtorapidgrowthoflocalgovernments.
GraphDepictingExternalEconomiesofScale
Sources[edit]
Purchasing[edit]
Firmsareabletolowertheiraveragecostsbybuyingtheirinputsrequiredfortheproductionprocessinbulkorfromspecialwholesalers.[40]
Managerial[edit]
Firmsmightbeabletolowertheiraveragecostsbyimprovingtheirmanagementstructurewithinthefirm.Thiscanrangefromhiringbetterskilledormoreexperiencedmanagersfromtheindustry.[40]
Technological[edit]
Technologicaladvancementswillchangetheproductionprocesswhichwillsubsequentlyreducetheoverallcostperunit.[41]
Seealso[edit]
Economicsportal
Economiesofdensity
Economiesofscope
Idealfirmsize
Massproduction
Networkeffect
Notes[edit]
^Manufactureofspecialtygradesbysmallscaleproducersisacommonpracticeinsteel,paper,andmanycommodityindustriestoday.Seevariousindustrytradepublications.
^Seevariousestimatingguides,suchasMeans.Alsoseevariousengineeringeconomicstextsrelatedtoplantdesignandconstruction,etc.
^Therelationshipisrathercomplex.Seeengineeringtextsonheattransfer.
^Inpractice,capitalcostestimatesarepreparedfromspecifications,budgetgradevendorpricingforequipment,generalarrangementdrawingsandmaterialstake-offsfromthedrawings.Thisinformationisthenusedincostformulastoarriveatafinaldetailedestimate.
References[edit]
Citations[edit]
^O'Sullivan,Arthur;Sheffrin,StevenM.(2003).Economics:PrinciplesinAction.UpperSaddleRiver,NJ:PearsonPrenticeHall.pp. 157.ISBN 978-0-13-063085-8.
^
Landes,David.S.(1969).TheUnboundPrometheus:TechnologicalChangeandIndustrialDevelopmentinWesternEuropefrom1750tothePresent.Cambridge,NewYork:PressSyndicateoftheUniversityofCambridge.ISBN 978-0-521-09418-4.Landesdescribestheproblemofnewsteelmillsinlate19thcenturyBritainbeingtoolargeforthemarketandunabletoeconomicallyproduceshortproductionrunsofspecialtygrades.Theoldmillshadanotheradvantageinthattheywerefullyamortized.
^
ChandlerJr.,AlfredD.(1993).TheVisibleHand:TheManagementRevolutioninAmericanBusiness.BelknapPressofHarvardUniversityPress.p. 236.ISBN 978-0674940529.Chandlerusestheexampleofhighturnoverindistribution.
^Robinson(1958),pp. 22–23;Scherer(1980),pp. 82–83;Pratten(1991),pp. 16–17.
^Morroni(2006),pp. 169–170.
^Baumol(1961),p. 1.
^Morroni(2006),pp. 170–171.
^"EconomiesofScale-Definition,Types,EffectsofEconomiesofScale".CorporateFinanceInstitute.Retrieved19May2022.
^Morroni(2006),p. 166.
^Smith(1976);Pratten(1991),pp. 7,17–8Ontherelationshipbetweenbuilt-intechnicalchangeandscalegrowth,seeEvangelista(1999),chapter4.
^Demsetz(1995),pp. 11,31–32showshowtheseeconomiesofscaleintheacquisitionofspecializedknowledgeplayanessentialroleintheexistenceofthecompany.
^Scherer(1980),p. 86;Penrose(1959),pp. 92ff.;Demsetz(1995),pp. 31–2.
^Rosenberg(1982);Levinetal.(1987);Scherer(2000),p. 22.
^Penrose(1959),pp. 99–101;Morroni(2006),p. 172.
^[[Inmicroeconomics,economiesofscalearethecostadvantagesthatenterprisesobtainduetosize,output,orscaleofoperation,withcostperunitofoutputgenerallydecreasingwithincreasingscaleasfixedcostsarespreadoutovermoreunitsofoutput.Oftenoperationalefficiencyisalsogreaterwithincreasingscale,leadingtolowervariablecostaswell.Economiesofscaleapplytoavarietyoforganizationalandbusinesssituationsandatvariouslevels,suchasabusinessormanufacturingunit,plantoranentireenterprise.Forexample,alargemanufacturingfacilitywouldbeexpectedtohavealowercostperunitofoutputthanasmallerfacility,allotherfactorsbeingequal,whileacompanywithmanyfacilitiesshouldhaveacostadvantageoveracompetitorwithfewer.Someeconomies|Moore,FredrickT.]](May1959)."EconomiesofScale:SomeStatisticalEvidence"(PDF).QuarterlyJournalofEconomics.73(2):232–245.doi:10.2307/1883722.JSTOR 1883722.
^Seevariousestimatingguidesthatpublishtablesoftaskscommonlyencounteredinbuildingtradeswithestimatesoflaborhoursandcostsperhourforthetrade,oftenwithregionalpricing.
^Seevariousengineeringhandbooksandmanufacturersdata.
^Rosenberg1982,p. 63
延伸文章資訊
- 1ECONOMIES OF SCALE在劍橋英語詞典中的解釋及翻譯
economies of scale的意思、解釋及翻譯:the reduction of production costs that is a result of making and sell...
- 2Economies of scale - Wikipedia
In microeconomics, economies of scale are the cost advantages that enterprises obtain due to thei...
- 3economy of scale | economics - Encyclopedia Britannica
economy of scale, in economics, the relationship between the size of a plant or industry and the ...
- 4Economies of Scale - Definition, Effects, Types, and Sources
Economies of scale refer to the cost advantage experienced by a firm when it increases its level ...
- 5Economies of Scale Definition - Investopedia
Economies of scale are the advantages that can sometimes occur as a result of increasing the size...